Sie schreibt zu ihrer Studie:
“The focus of this study is on how weblogs support one specific aspect of knowledge work – developing ideas. Although I share the belief that knowledge is socially constructed, here I look at this process from a personal perspective, using my own example to explore how a weblog could be used to aid individual contributions to the collective whole.“

Dabei hebt Lilia Efimova folgende Aspekte des Bloggens hervor (ich fasse zusammen):

1. Using weblog as a personal knowledge base: a permanent “overhead” practice of building one’s own knowledge
2. Processing of turning fuzzy early insights into a specific product (idea): “Activation-awareness
3. Exploring contextual factors by examining what issues arise as a result of blogging being situated at an intersection of personal, social and organisational contexts.

Für Lilia ist ein Blog – in erster Linie – “a personal thinking space”. Sie schreibt dazu:

“And, on the top of it, I get annoyed when blogging is conceptualised primarily as a medium for public communication (especially with microphones or megaphones as a visual metaphor ;). So, working on a PhD chapter that describes my own blogging practices, I wanted to show the other side of it – blogging for myself”.

Das passt ganz gut, dem kann ich mich nämlich anschliessen.
Und das motiviert mich zu weiteren Beiträgen. :)

Blog von Lilia Efimova: http://blog.mathemagenic.com

Ich hab’s mir einfach erlaubt die sieben Prinzipien des Wissensmanagements aus dem Blogpost von Dave Showden hier direkt zu übernehmen.

• # Knowledge can only be volunteered it cannot be conscripted. You can’t make someone share their knowledge, because you can never measure if they have. You can measure information transfer or process compliance, but you can’t determine if a senior partner has truly passed on all their experience or knowledge of a case.
• # We only know what we know when we need to know it. Human knowledge is deeply contextual and requires stimulus for recall. Unlike computers we do not have a list-all function. Small verbal or nonverbal clues can provide those ah-ha moments when a memory or series of memories are suddenly recalled, in context to enable us to act. When we sleep on things we are engaged in a complex organic form of knowledge recall and creation; in contrast a computer would need to be rebooted.
• # In the context of real need few people will withhold their knowledge. A genuine request for help is not often refused unless there is literally no time or a previous history of distrust. On the other hand ask people to codify all that they know in advance of a contextual enquiry and it will be refused (in practice its impossible anyway). Linking and connecting people is more important than storing their artifacts.
• # Everything is fragmented. We evolved to handle unstructured fragmented fine granularity information objects, not highly structured documents. People will spend hours on the internet, or in casual conversation without any incentive or pressure. However creating and using structured documents requires considerably more effort and time. Our brains evolved to handle fragmented patterns not information.
• # Tolerated failure imprints learning better than success. When my young son burnt his finger on a match he learnt more about the dangers of fire than any amount of parental instruction cold provide. All human cultures have developed forms that allow stories of failure to spread without attribution of blame. Avoidance of failure has greater evolutionary advantage than imitation of success. It follows that attempting to impose best practice systems is flying in the face of over a hundred thousand years of evolution that says it is a bad thing.
• # The way we know things is not the way we report we know things. There is an increasing body of research data which indicates that in the practice of knowledge people use heuristics, past pattern matching and extrapolation to make decisions, coupled with complex blending of ideas and experiences that takes place in nanoseconds. Asked to describe how they made a decision after the event they will tend to provide a more structured process oriented approach which does not match reality. This has major consequences for knowledge management practice.
• # We always know more than we can say, and we will always say more than we can write down. This is probably the most important. The process of taking things from our heads, to our mouths (speaking it) to our hands (writing it down) involves loss of content and context. It is always less than it could have been as it is increasingly codified.

Cognitive Edge